> There are facts, and then there is customer service. This website is not a customer service venue, it's a developer tool. The goal is to do well by our users, but to do so we have to operate with efficiency, and keeping the bug database in a condition useful to developers helps with that.
Yes, we could kiss your arse and hand you chocolates and all the other trappings of traditional customer relations, but the relation we prefer is to treat you as our equal in the participative endeavour that open source development is (the fruits of which you also got for free, by the way). As our equal we hope you would mind the same broader concerns we need to mind, such as spending our resources wisely. With that in mind I did not deflect anything, instead I offered reason. I'm sorry you felt not respected, but I hope you can see the respect that is in transparency of that kind. > To say "nor do we have such old Qt versions ourselves to test with" is > patently false, because I didn't go out of my way to downgrade to this > version. None of the Konversation developers uses Kubuntu/Ubuntu. Konversation nor KDE are affiliated with that distro. "LTS" is a promise made by your system vendor; you should inquire why they don't support you by supplying bugfixes that already exist. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1269199 Title: Qt library crashes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/konversation/+bug/1269199/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
