On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Marco Cimmino <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ultimately, I think you'd need two packages - one skype package that > is arch-independent so that you always end up with a 'skype' package > installed, and a skype-bin which installs the i386 binaries > > I guess I haven't been clear enough, but Skype is NOT interested in > creating TWO packages only to workaround this problem.
Sorry Marco - I do understand that you're not interested in creating two packages, I was only commenting that we need to ask someone who may know other solutions, as I can't see how it could work without that. I've already contacted Steve, and am waiting to hear back from him. > Plus this mean on > skype.com we would need to make a i386 and an amd64 packages, both will > pull a THIRD package i386, 3 packages to fix a simple usability problem > on USC? I think is too much. If there is something in the deb file we > can add to avoid this I am more than happy to do so, but releasing 3 > packages only for Ubuntu doesn't seem something we want to do. Yes, I totally understand that. Let's see what Steve says. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263128 Title: Skype is hidden under "technical items" in USC when installed from deb downloaded from skype.com To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/1263128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
