Public bug reported:
As it seems still to be missing, I'd like to suggest a hint or an example in
the man page (or a link there to external information) how ifenslave is used
when specifying bonding interfaces in /etc/network/interfaces. Inspired by
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/1015199 I found
out the following things which need to be clearified (i.e. should be clear
after reading the man page):
1.) Does the order of interfaces matter in /etc/network/interfaces (it
shouldn't...)
2.) What stanzas to write: auto? allow-bondX? both, none?
3.) What means <code>bond-slaves none</code>?
5.) If it is necessary to invoke <code>ifup slave0 && ifup slave1 && ...
</code> before <code>ifup bond0</code>, how can anyone use bonded interfaces
with auto stanza?
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/1073820 is fixed,
but I don't understand WHAT has been fixed)
6.) Which are other ways to configure a bonding interface -> EXAMPLES!!
** Affects: ifenslave-2.6 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1279651
Title:
[doc enhance] Add example or comment for /etc/network/interfaces to
man page
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/1279651/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
