> Not just that the wiki would seem to be not quite right, but also that > some well-understood convention is needed, for use when one person > justifiably assigns a bug to another.
The convention is already well understood among Ubuntu developers... > So more than a month was wasted, when someone productive could have > stepped forward. That's not really anything that can be solved by policy or by technical means. And frankly, if this went unnoticed for a month, it's not likely that someone was going to step up to work on it during that period anyway. > PS: Great to see this Pentium-M stuff getting some love at last. I know > that many devs with screaming fast i7 kit think it's a non-issue, too > old to worry about, affects a tiny minority. Just to be clear, nothing we're doing here is going to change the compatibility of Ubuntu 14.04 with non-PAE systems; only to stop users from upgrading and accidentally winding up with a broken system post-upgrade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160346 Title: do-release-upgrade from Ubuntu 12.04 on Pentium-M fails, breaks system without any warning (This kernel does not support a non-PAE CPU) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1160346/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
