Thank you for investigating this.
> I report bugs like this with the intention to help fix it for the
future. When I run into a similar situation again in the future, I
prefer to have helped get it fixed as opposed to running into the
problems again.
Understood, and we appreciate this. Please do continue to report bugs in
this fashion.
> I'm guessing that some new feature in the protocol was not properly
surrounded with "if (negotiatedprotocol > xxx) .."
It seems to me that this might be a mistake, and not done on purpose. If
you can take this further, perhaps you could check to see if upstream
know about this issue already, and if not then raise it in their bug
tracker?
I'll mark this as Invalid in Ubuntu on the assumption that this is
intentional behaviour, but if it turns out that it isn't, and there's a
fix, we can always change this.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300768
Title:
Rsync fails with (very) old server.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/1300768/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
