Hi Adam,
Sorry for the misunderstanding but to me the answer to my question ("Yeah,
I think that would satisfy me.") as to whether this was enough to get the
FFe approved sounds like an unofficial ACK.
So the question is now... Will this be ACK'd or NACK'd?
On Apr 11, 2014 8:16 AM, "Adam Conrad" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wouldn't say I "unofficially approved the FFe", that's twisting my
> words and the content of our conversations. I gave you the reasons why
> I would flat out reject the upload (FFe or not), and even petition to
> have it removed from the archive if the "install non-free software by
> default" feature slipped in.
>
> You addressed those concerns, which is great, but none of that relates
> to the bit where you're trying to land new features a week before
> release, and a month and a half after feature freeze.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305839
>
> Title:
> FFe: Support for Third Party Driver Installation
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1305839/+subscriptions
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305839
Title:
FFe: Support for Third Party Driver Installation
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1305839/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
