Hi Phillip,

Hm, that I'm not sure of..
IIRC that part of the code expects only the disk block device without the 
partition number, but I haven't gone through it in detail.
(I guess the [0-9] range is there for disks named after sd1 or something like 
that, which I haven't seen yet, but recall something similar on a log file from 
the past)

But if it indeed does, then, fair enough: that's a better argument (less
unlikely scenario :-) for fixing this.

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325606

Title:
  grub-installer fails on 26+ disks (restrictive shell pattern)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1325606/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to