The only problem is that the binary should be named differently, should it not? That is, no more libquazip.so.1.0.0 or whatever the version is? Instead, we'll have libquazip-qt4.so.1.0.0 and libquazip-qt5.so.1.0.0. But that would break backwards compatibility. Or did you mean checking "qmake -v" to provide a symlink for the default binary as "libquazip.so.1.0.0"?
I'm seriously thinking about changing target binary names in upstream, though, precisely to avoid this kind of confusion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317551 Title: libquazip binary package has critical bugs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libquazip/+bug/1317551/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
