Sorry about the tone, now that I re-read it it does indeed sound a bit rude.
Regarding the issue, so my bad, caching is indeed done. It hadn't occurred to me to look at the settings. Increasing the cache size fixed all the issues described here, so I guess the bug report can be closed as invalid. Perhaps the default value of 32MB is too small, though? Or... What about (this is a genuine question/suggestion, not a sarchastic "what about") an "automatic" option that would increase cache size (never beyound a maximum) when too-frequent cache misses are detected? (and this option could be the default)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1331689 Title: Completely unusable with large heavy documents To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qpdfview/+bug/1331689/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
