i dont see any sort of explanation as to why a dependency is not appropriate. I see a.) stgraber agreeing that there should be a dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/1160360/comments/5 b.) loic suggesting that some other piece of software should be used to decide which packages to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/1160488/comments/1
why is it not possible to do the right thing? Why couldn't whatever logic is used to decide "should I install flash- kernel" instead be used at runtime? ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1160360 flash-kernel failed in an armhf lxc container on ARM: /usr/sbin/flash-kernel: 214: /usr/sbin/flash-kernel: mkimage: not found -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1337538 Title: arm64/xgene-uboot lacks u-boot-tools To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas-images/+bug/1337538/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
