Seems unlikely: diff -r atlas3-3.6.0-13/interfaces/blas/F77/src/f77wrap/ATL_F77wrap_trmv.c atlas3-3.6.0-20/interfaces/blas/F77/src/f77wrap/ATL_F77wrap_trmv.c 107a108,110 > > /* This is to workaround a compiler bug in gcc 4.0.0 with > -fomit-frame-pointer. 20050927 CM*/ > TYPE *j=W1N( N, X, INCX ); 109c112 < W1N( N, X, INCX ), *INCX ); --- > j, *INCX ); diff -r atlas3-3.6.0-13/interfaces/blas/F77/src/f77wrap/ATL_F77wrap_trsv.c atlas3-3.6.0-20/interfaces/blas/F77/src/f77wrap/ATL_F77wrap_trsv.c 110a111,112 > /* This is to workaround a compiler bug in gcc 4.0.0 with > -fomit-frame-pointer. 20050927 CM*/ > TYPE *j=W1N( N, X, INCX ); 112c114 < W1N( N, X, INCX ), *INCX ); --- > j, *INCX );
I was thinking more about the compiler change, which testing -19 could have confirmed. -- Error in linalg.svd for large matrix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
