Paulo Assis: > For applications I would definitely adopt some sort of rolling > release, but for core stuff (kernel, desktop manager, core libs) I > think a timed release is probably better, as it would help keep the > system more stable. > I don't think keeping a broken app for 6 months, just because that's > the version available in debian at the time of release, is a very good > policy, specially if a fixed version is already available.
Then I see that I'm not the only one who thought it: that software releasing need different approaches depending on how much interdependency there is. Okay: so than you for your insight. I think that you have managed this bug very diligently :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1373221 Title: guvcview crashed with SIGSEGV in get_ctrl_by_id() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/guvcview/+bug/1373221/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
