** Description changed:
Recently, our group is trying to find SSL security problems by static
analysis. When using Openssl, people tend to miss the step or to
misunderstand the APIs when using SSL/TLS, which might cause severe man
in the middle attack and break the entire TLS mechanism. And static
analysis is a way of finding whether the APIs are called correctly.
- Now we just check whether a software verify the certitiface chain when
- using Openssl.
+ The source code we analysis was from ubuntu: apt-get source <package
name>.And we use this command in Ubuntu 12.04.
+ Now we just check whether a software verify the certitiface chain when using
Openssl.
一. How we ensure whether a software check the certificate chain or not?
We make a matching algorithm. If source code doesn't match this, the software
is not secure.
Typically, when Openssl clients want to verify a certificate, there are
the following choices:
1. Using built-in certificate verification(chain of trust verification,
expired validation, etc)
[Example 1]
- /**
- * set VERIFY_PEER flag before the establishment of a SSL connection
- * OPENSSL will drop connection during handshake if verification fails
- * No custom callback function used.
- */
- SSL_CTX_set_verify(ctx,VERIFY_PEER,NULL);
+ /**
+ * set VERIFY_PEER flag before the establishment of a SSL connection
+ * OPENSSL will drop connection during handshake if verification fails
+ * No custom callback function used.
+ */
+ SSL_CTX_set_verify(ctx,VERIFY_PEER,NULL);
[Example 2]
//check the built-in verification result after the SSL handshake
if(SSL_get_peer_certificate(ssl)!=NULL &&
SSL_get_verify_result(ssl)==X509_V_OK)
{
- //PASS
+ //PASS
}
else
{
- //FAIL
+ //FAIL
}
2. Using custom verification.
[Example 3]
X509* usrcert = SSL_get_peer_certificate(ssl);
rootCertStore = X509_STORE_new();
.. ..
ctx = X509_STORE_CTX_new();
ret = X509_STORE_CTX_init(ctx,rootCertStore,usrCert,NULL);
ret = X509_verify_cert(ctx)
This example read the certificate out using SSL_get_peer_certificate
API. Then it use X509 API suite to do certificate verification. X509 API
is part of OPENSSL library. Theoretically, a developer can use any API
in any libraries to do this verification, but in practice, we only
identify the case above: using X509 API suite.
3. Add restrictions or relaxations to built-in certificate verification
The built-in certificate verification in OPENSSL library can be extended by
using custom callback functions. By default, this callback option is NULL,
indicating completely use built-in verification.
By adding this callback function, the developer can decide if they accept the
verify result by openssl, and they can modify the result whenever they what.
[Example 4]
SSL_CTX_set_verify(ctx,VERIFY_PEER,mycallback);
static mycallback(int preverify_ok, X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
{
....
....
return preverify_ok;
}
二. The analysis result
Now, we find some SSL problems in perdition, the following is details:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
file : perdition/perdition-1.19~rc4/perdition/ssl.c
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
function : __perdition_ssl_connection
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSL method : SSLv23
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSL_CTX_set_verify() argument : SSL_VERIFY_PEER
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have SSL_CTX_set_verify ( SSL_set_verify) callback : YES (but accept
self-signed certificate & expired certificate)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
call SSL_get_peer_certificate(): NO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
call SSL_get_verify_result(): NO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the above result, we think the SSL connection in perdition
is not secure .perdition can accept self-signed certificate &
certificate, which means MITM attack is possible.
PS: for more information, you can see the paper:
http://people.stfx.ca/x2011/x2011ucj/SSL/p38-georgiev.pdf
and more details you can contact with us, we will be very glad for your
responce.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1380304
Title:
perdition have some SSL security problems
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perdition/+bug/1380304/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
