On 22-10-14 10:28:15, Bruno Nova wrote: > As I don't have a working computer with NVIDIA only, I can't test this > myself. > But the bug reporter and another commenter are/were affected. There are also > several people marked as "affected". > And I can see other people in the Web using an NVIDIA card complaining about > Steam and Skype not finding the 32-bit libGL.so.1 or that it has "wrong ELF > class" (because /usr/lib is listed before /usr/lib32, they say), in Trusty or > previous releases. > > Both /usr/lib/nvidia-XXX/alt_ld.so.conf and > /usr/lib/nvidia-XXX-prime/alt_ld.so.conf are empty in my system. > If this is to avoid using 32-bit Mesa libraries, couldn't > /usr/lib/nvidia-XXX/alt_ld.so.conf be pointing to the NVIDIA 32-bit libraries > (like the bug reporter suggested)?
It wouldn't change anything, since /usr/lib/nvidia-331-prime/ld.so.conf already includes both the 32 bit and the 64 bit libraries. Splitting the two paths into two separate files won't make any difference. > Also, /usr/lib/nvidia-XXX-prime/alt_ld.so.conf could point to the 32-bit Mesa > libraries (but they are not installed by default, so the nvidia-prime could > recommend libgl1-mesa-glx:i386). > I don't think I can make a 64 bit package depend on (or recommend) a 32 bit package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181651 Title: ldconfig problem with 64-bit nvidia driver packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/1181651/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
