This looks fine to me. ScottK assures me that the embedded copy is the same version, so this is really just shuffling code around to make it less opaque and more maintainable. Would be good if we could eliminate other embedded copies in the same pass, but getting more consumers for the library shouldn't block the MIR for clamav's sake. ACKing and promoting.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386991 Title: [MIR] libmspack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmspack/+bug/1386991/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
