On 9/10/07, Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have you by any chance installed (from source or something else) a > different OpenOffice.org? > I believe the problem is this symlink:
Not that I'm aware of. /usr/bin/openoffice -> ooo-wrapper > > which is pointing to the wrong executable. It should be: yeah, odd, ooo-wrpapper doesn't even exist on this system , either /usr/bin/openoffice -> ooffice > > I expect that changing the symlink will solve the problem, but I don't > understand why you have got it in the first place. The package is > correct, so its not a packaging problem; any other explanation? Well, that works for me - pretty odd. Thanks for explaining. -Randy Fischer -- openoffice appears installed, but openoffice binary missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
