I noticed it is possible with Intel chipsets to make partitions with different raid levels. I will try to make raid0 and raid1 partitions for speed (OS) and recovery (home) and see if dmraid can see them, it's a good alternative to raid5.
Or I'll just buy one more hard disk and try to use raid10, or give up raid and install ubuntu there as a last resort. On 9/12/07, Thomas Bittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CoolkcaH schrieb: > > Thomas are you still working on the live cd? I need it because I don't > > have any other hard disk to install ubuntu...when you get it to work > > please report. > no, i don't - i waited a couple of weeks for the stuff from Heinz - but he was > too busy i guess ... > > my raid5 under windows xp is really instable, so i have to do a (really slow) > complete rebuild around twice a month. so i truly don't expect an improved > situation if the whole thing runs under linux. > > as a workaround i installed ubuntu under vmware, it worked pretty well and > performance wasn't too bad. > > for now i'm going back to raid1 ... sorry and good luck. > > Cheers, > Thomas > > -- > dmraid45 target please > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
