Le 10/02/2015 18:14, Aron Xu a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Didier Roche <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> -> fcitx:
>> * NEEDS FIXING: I guess the autostart binary (in fcitx-bin) shouldn't be
>> in usr/bin, but more in an exec path like libexec for instance. You told
>> upstream liked the idea, any news since september for a release with
>> this? I would prefer that we don't pulling the user PATH with autostart
>> content.
>>
>>
> Upstream changed their mind because they think it's a tool that can be used
> to detect whether fcitx is running already, and they don't think renaming
> it useful. Can we keep it there?
Fair enough :)
All good an approved, thanks a lot for the modifications! So now, get
something in main depending on fcitx and other packages (like seeding,
or a recommends/deps) and we'll promote to main the needed binaries.
** Changed in: fcitx-table-extra (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: presage (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: libgooglepinyin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: tinyxml (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356222
Title:
[MIR] fcitx and related packages
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcitx/+bug/1356222/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
