For some use cases, it looks like a read-only access should be sufficient (and actually preferable), such as cases #1 and #3. For the #2 (app syncing your online photos) write access would also be needed.
So, ideally, when granting permanent access to a location, it would be great if the developer can specify whether the access needs to be read only or read-write. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1425955 Title: Support "permanent" connections To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/content-hub/+bug/1425955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
