> But I'm a bit worried, doesn't not mounting cpuset mean that containers, > for instance, wouldn't work so well?
You just won't be able to lock containers to cpusets. > That is, even if cgmanager doesn't mount the cpuset cgroup, if > *anything* mounts it, processes in that cgroup tree will experience the > underlying issue, no? Yes. And I still think that systemd is currently mounting it regardless of cgmanager. So ideally the effective_cpus thing would be fixed to work for non-unified hierarchies. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1392176 Title: mounts cgroups unconditionally which causes undesired effects with cpu hotplug To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cgmanager/+bug/1392176/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
