> I don't think that providing the example configuration files would obviate > the need to use the documentation. No one ever said anything pointing in that direction!
> If you use the documentation, then you don't need the sample files. Agreed, but no argument against my proposal. > Also, there's no requirement that those file names be used. Don't understand that point neither. Just add commented pointers in `main.cf` & Co. The fact that included and referenced configuration files can be named differently is quite self-explanatory (why would we write pathes into configuration files otherwise?). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447755 Title: Provide default configuration files for transport, virtual, etc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1447755/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
