Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: linux-restricted-modules

The Intel Pro/Wireless 3945abg controller in my new Thinkpad T61 sometimes 
hangs, around once every twelve hours. I can identify no direct cause, although 
I have only experienced this when on line power. Any attempt to remove the 
ipw3945 module from the kernel after this happens also hangs, as does trying to 
kill -9 NetworkManager. This may be a duplicate of bug #118110, but I never see 
"microcode SW error detected. Restarting." in my dmesg. This is with 
linux-image-2.6.22-11-generic and linux-restricted-modules-2.6.22-11-generic, 
on Gutsy. Below is the end of /var/log/kern.log after a hang:
Sep 20 15:55:14 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9873.149617] ipw3945: Error sending cmd 
#07 to daemon: time out after 500ms.
Sep 20 15:55:16 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9874.480288] ipw3945: Error sending 
SCAN_ABORT_CMD: time out after 500ms.
Sep 20 15:55:16 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9874.754086] ipw3945: Error sending cmd 
#08 to daemon: time out after 500ms.
Sep 20 15:55:17 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9875.104638] ipw3945: Error sending 
ADD_STA: time out after 500ms.
Sep 20 15:55:17 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9875.378949] ipw3945: Error sending 
SCAN_ABORT_CMD: time out after 500ms.
Sep 20 15:55:21 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9878.457100] ipw3945: Error sending 
LEDS_CMD: time out after 500ms.
Sep 20 15:55:39 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9897.096306] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: 
link is not ready
Sep 20 15:56:16 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9933.412673] ipw3945: Error sending 
LEDS_CMD: time out after 500ms.
Sep 20 15:56:17 lappy-x86-64 kernel: [ 9933.659750] ipw3945: Error sending 
LEDS_CMD: time out after 500ms.

** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
ipw3945 hangs intermittently on Thinkpad T61
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141396
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to