Speaking of advanced routers, I'm setting up Quagga on Debian, and looking to do the same on 2 Ubuntu routers. When configuring BGP sessions to 1 upstream provider's Blackhole route server, Linux > 2.6.20.1 is required for TCP_MD5 passwords.
What's interesting, is the debate about the kernel side, and it's bleeding edge status... and how I find it's in Ubuntu's kernel, Feisty and Gutsy, but *not* in Debian etch or testing. How would a conservative Ubuntu kernel have such a bleeding edge feature, that's pretty deep in the network stack, but not something that's been in Debian for *years*, which is an isolated module? Jeremy On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 13:16 +0000, GSMD wrote: > Yeah, the attitude of Ubuntu maintainers plain sucks for this matter. > Having connmark enabled by default can't brake anything. I don't mind > recompiling the kernel by hand, but this would break automatic kernel > security updates and add more headache. Just don't get it. > -- Jeremy Jackson Coplanar Networks (519)489-4903 -- ipt_connmark is broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
