Based on comments 19 and 24, even version 1.5.2 would presumably not pass a security review. In Seth's words, "This package needs a severe overhaul."
Til, you even say in comment 21 that openjpeg is dead upstream. I get that it might be reviving (comment 22), but unless you say otherwise, I will assume that a point release is not where a severe overhaul has taken place. I understand the frustration with the lack of proper jpeg2000 support. But I'd rather not promote a package we believe will just create security problems down the road. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711061 Title: [MIR] openjpeg To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg/+bug/711061/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
