On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:57:58PM -0000, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > I attempted to revert the other two commits. However, there are allot > of prereqs that also need to be removed. I think a bisect would be > faster due to that. > > I started a bisect between v4.0 final and v4.1 final. It will require > testing about 8 - 10 test kernels. > > I built the first test kernel up to commit: > d0a3997c0c3f9351e24029349dee65dd1d9e8d84 > > The test kernel can be downloaded from: > http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1478623/ > > Can you test this kernel and see if it exhibits this bug? I'll build > the next test kernel based on your results.
I can do if you want, but it will be much faster if you (or someone who can easily build the new kernels) does it... If you like, I can supply a .img with the pre-reqs installed (by running the steps I gave in the bug description). Let me know what you think. -- Iain Lane [ [email protected] ] Debian Developer [ [email protected] ] Ubuntu Developer [ [email protected] ] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1478623 Title: [4.1.0 regression] Kernel oops - blk_update_request: I/O error when running udisks2 force_test_removal test To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1478623/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
