Chris, Could you review [Regression Potential] section I updated just now ? I think this should be the responsibility of existing packages to make they are doing the correct thing. This change in lsb should be in the right road, and the same change has also landed into Utopic, so this change should also land in Trusty. maybe what we can do now is try to enumerate this kinds of bad packages. right ? I also have some search for the call /etc/init.d/<service name>, but I did find at the moment except freeradius you mentioned in bug 1406105. Do you have any better way to deal with this tricky situation ? thanks.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1273462 Title: Users can mistakenly run init.d scripts and cause problems if an equivalent upstart job already exists To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/1273462/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
