Just read this: > > Conceptually, a diverting package actually pre-depends on the package > > being diverted.
Furthermore: > Current behaviour of dpkg-divert is not an excuse to retain it, IMHO. > Conceptually, dpkg-divert in preinst scripts is just wrong. >From this discussion: https://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2010/04/msg00025.html I don't know what to make of all this :) I guess there are many discussions about how to do things, but the Debian Wiki suggests to put things in preinst, which then makes everything diversion a "conceptual pre-depends". https://wiki.debian.org/Adding%20and%20removing%20diversions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1483923 Title: dpkg-divert breaks nginx installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1483923/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
