I see the names are consistent across MAAS UI and deployment. However, during the commissioning stage, I guess the biosdevname is not installed, so the names on MAAS are all ethX, so after the system are provisioned, the names in the OS are all ethX. I would rather see emX and pXpX instead.
I run into a problem that i use bonding with ethX (as it is ethX in OS). and the mac address of ethX was changed, so bonding fails. I bet if i use emX naming, that shouldn't be a problem? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1423626 Title: Inconsistent device naming depending on install method - biosdevname/no biosdevname To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1423626/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
