Indeed it does! I just ran a complete test with this on the server:

   socat TCP-LISTEN:8443,fork UNIX-CLIENT:/var/lib/lxd/unix.socket &

and this on the client:

  socat UNIX-LISTEN:/var/lib/lxd/unix.socket,unlink-early,mode=666,fork
TCP:10.43.42.59:8443 &

After two or three runs lxd locks up and needs to be restarted, but that
happens with the "real" port and locally too, so that's a separate issue
(bug 1531768). So I think this is working.

Should we close this bug (which so far was really a support request,
thanks!), or keep it open for making this easier/more obvious in lxd?
Like an "lxc config set core.remote unsafe" option?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538174

Title:
  ways to speed up overhead of "lxc exec" on remote containers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1538174/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to