I disagree.
1) non-root users can fetch source packages with pull-lp-source
2) non-root users can fetch source packages with chdist
3) ubuntu users buy pre-installed IoT, routers, phones, tablets, laptops,
desktops, servers, clouds, mainframes
4) For fast majority of ubuntu users, the concept and religion of free software
is valuable
5) But most of them do not practice their rights.
Yes, pulling source and rebuilding a package is nice. From commandline,
which one needs to know how to use... And to do it probably, one will be
doing it in sbuild anyway.
I find it ironic that most of Ubuntu products have sources disabled,
including launchpad builders, yet the "default" is enabled by default.
In practice, it really only needs to be enabled on developer machines
which by definition is always less than the number of installations.
This is the same sort of logic, where "obvious" seems to end up as
default. E.g. default ubuntu archive location is ports.ubuntu.com
because majority of architectures are hosted there, with amd64 & i386 as
an exception. yet in plenty of configs i see default set to
archive.ubuntu.com with 5 overrides stating that it should be
ports.ubuntu.com. Whilst we provide sources by default, it's an opt-in
behavior of an installed machine, which requires an interactive user,
with a highly specialized knowledge to perform the operation.
** Changed in: apt-setup (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox)
** Also affects: apt-setup (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox)
Status: Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74747
Title:
Default sources.list file has source packages enabled by default
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-setup/+bug/74747/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
