So, I applied a version of the first point in git (with a different version that is not invented), that should be enough.
For the second one: I'm not sure I like adding that in debian at all. It shouldn't be necessary anyway (also considering that my evil plan includes pushing for the removals of those conflicting dictionaries in the long run), tbh. In particular, the addition of the Conflicts to myspell-es is not necessary, the files don't conflicts For the third: I'd rather upload a openoffice.org-hyphenation without the conflicting dictionaries once this one is uploaded and don't care more, it sounds cleaner, and maybe add a Breaks+Replaces on lo-dicts instead. The remaining hyphenation dicts in oo.o-hyphenation would be en_CA, es_ES (but this is really redundant), fi_FI, ga_IE, id_ID, is_IS; maybe I can get some of them in libreoffice-dictionaries in the future (way too late for xenial). There is another thing that probably you missed: adding transitional packages from myspell-* to hunspell-*. I don't want to add them in debian for sure. This is maybe the only little thing that I veto against, so this is actually the only delta that should be needed, in debian/control.in, that can just go away once xenial is released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510198 Title: Rebase/Reimplement Ubuntu changes upon Debian (possibly upstream them) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice-dictionaries/+bug/1510198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
