On 31/03/2016 18:36, Rodney Dawes wrote: > Should this be closed as a duplicate of that bug then?
No: this bug is about the U1 account being missing from the providers' list; the other one is about how the account details page appears for the U1 account. > And that is not nice about Twitter. I'd say that's a regression. It > certainly used to work in the way I described. Requiring an app to say > it uses specific accounts for those accounts to appear in the providers > list, is, to put it mildly, excessive. I don't understand where your complain lies. Let me try to break your sentence into smaller statements, and pick the right one(s): 1) You don't like the fact that apps have to declare beforehand which account types they can use; 2) You don't like the fact that accounts which are not used by any app cannot be created. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559506 Title: Ubuntu One Account is not showing in the list of possible accounts. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1559506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
