@Alkis:

> What issues should they expect from gnome-flashback then?
>  - Harder window resizing due to 1 px border.
>  - Notify-osd notifications ==> I did a quick test and they seem to work; 
> albeit without transparency. Did I miss something?

Right, without transparency and without rounded corners, which is not
the best possible look…

>  - Decorations ==> Example? I couldn't reproduce it.

By decorations I meant the 1px border area, which you already mentioned.
There may be problems with rounded corners here too.

>  - Various docks ==> Example?

Almost any dock will have complicated (i.e. not rectangular) geometry,
which isn't supported without compositing. Try Plank for an example.

@Alberts:

> What is atom systems? Anyway

Intel Atom?

> As upstream developer I am interested that GNOME-Flashback is as close
as possible to what I have upstream. And currently it is far from it
(GNOME-Flashback:Unity).

My plan is to fix this in Xenial+1. Less patches will mean less work for
me, too :P

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565640

Title:
  Set compositing-manager=false by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1565640/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to