------- Comment From [email protected] 2016-04-05 09:19 EDT------- Hi @cyphermox,
> I sponsored multipath-tools as provided by Mauricio; some comments: Thanks! > [...] It all in all feels like the least > intrusive way to deal with multipath disks on any random system (but I'm > happy to be shown I'm mistaken! :) Agree. > [...] there *should* be some extensive > testing of various multipath scenarios again before release to iron out any > other last-minute bugs. [...] Certainly. As mentioned in LP 1551952, for some reassurance (w/ bugs it seems to be never enough :-), there's at least one test team running multipath testing around here, which helped to find these 2 initial regressions from the merge, and hopefully any other bugs that the additional changes might introduce. > [...] Among other things, we'd > really benefit from testing with Tore Anderson's use case, which is > different enough from the typical tests being done on FC and ppc64 to expose > some fun bugs. That looks interesting to follow up on. Is the best way to contact him directly, or there are some things documented anywhere for me to check it out in advance? Thanks! > Finally, all these changes indeed need to go to Debian; we'd really benefit > from reducing our delta even more, such as making sure all the patches are > shared, including find_multipaths if possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565817 Title: multipath: LVM physical volumes on individual paths To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1565817/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
