Quoting Thiago Martins ([email protected]): > Guys, > > I'm curious about this... > > * Mesa will be upgraded from 11.1, to 11.2... Big changes... > > * MySQL just got upgraded from 5.6, to 5.7! > > * APT was upgraded from 1.2.5, to 1.2.7... > > All very recent upgrades that just happened on Xenial... > > So, why this big resistance to upgrade Libvirt from 1.3.1, to 1.3.2? > Most recent Libvirt 1.3.3 is already on Debian!
And not building. > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libvirt > > Anyway, I'm just curious about why Libvirt can not receive a last > minute update, while many other packages can! Why is that? Because there is no good reason to do so, and the current version seems to be working well. We were open to it and considered it. If debian had 1.3.2 packaged we probably would have merged it, but we didn't want to risk having different .orig tarballs. If 1.3.3 (was stable and) had great benefits, we would consider merging it. But finalfreeze is now 3 days away. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558857 Title: Upgrade to latest stable version v1.3.3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1558857/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
