On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:50:28PM -0000, Martin Packman wrote: > Martin Pitt: We currently don't have lxd as a dep on this package > because it's included by default on the image.
This is not a justification for omitting the dependency. If the juju package relies on lxd for its core functionality, it should be declared as a dependency, even if the lxd package is installed by default. The only exceptions to this rule are packages declared Essential: yes. > If I add it (as a depends, or recommends), does that mean our autopkgtests > including the lxd provider ones will run on new lxd package uploads and > prevent them entering the archive in future? Yes. (Which, I hope it's clear, is the desired behavior for autopkgtests.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545913 Title: [FFe] juju-core 2.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1545913/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
