Either the according package lists its successor(s) in the Depends field
(then it's usually called "transitional package") or there is no
(direct) successor at all. That can also happen.
Aptitude doesn't know more than the package (list) tells it.
Or do you have a different idea how Aptitude should list successor
packages?
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1569168
Title:
Missing sucessor for obsolete package
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/1569168/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
