Hi! Cool! I think that screencast makes it easier to report. :-D
Sure, I'll send this bug report to both mailing lists, with some time indexes, good idea... Yes, if you bind it back to virtio-pci, by running "dpdk_nic_bind -b <ID> virtio-pci", instead of reboot, speed drop just like before. On 2 May 2016 at 08:22, ChristianEhrhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > I absolutely like the video-bug-report. > One might ask if everyone will spend the time to watch it, but it nicely > summarizes what you see. > > But I have to admit, that I have no idea yet what might cause it. > If possible I would strongly encourage you to report it to the development > mailing lists of both involved projects and keep me in the loop. > > When reporting you might want to add a few time indexes like: > when I unbind the driver at 11:40 you see the speed being good again. > > Then the only slight "change" to the vieo, but you can do that as a > comment - you showed that the speed drops again when you reboot your > guest and it is back at virtio-pci driver. Would it drop the same way as > well if you just would use dpdk_nic_bind -b <ID> virtio-pci ? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577256 > > Title: > The OVS+DPDK dpdkvhostuser socket bridge, only works as expected, if > the KVM Guest also have DPDK drivers loaded > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1577256/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577256 Title: The OVS+DPDK dpdkvhostuser socket bridge, only works as expected, if the KVM Guest also have DPDK drivers loaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/+bug/1577256/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
