Hi Georg, On 06/07/16 09:55, GGeorg wrote: > could you provide the patch so we could review it ? The box file you > provided is in no way compareable to cloud-images.
The box file I provided is what we expect to become the cloud image; it is directly comparable. :) > The box file is about twice the size - so it was built in another way. It wasn't built another way, but it was built to contain more useful packages. > I think the only proper way to fix this (no change in filesystem or > installed packets) is changing the config drive user-data .. which > should be not hard to implement and is isolated to vagrant only cloud- > image .. We're happy to make Vagrant-specific changes to the Vagrant image, so we can change this in the filesystem. > Could you relay us the process Louis Zuckerman layed out - so we could > provide a patch ? I was unable to find the script that creates the > cloud-images on cloud-images.ubuntu.com You can find the changes Louis has proposed at [0], which also includes how he tested his changes. (The images on cloud-images.ubuntu.com are produced using Launchpad's buildds; all of the software that is used is open-source, but for security reasons access to the build farm is restricted to Canonical employees; the image provided above was built using the buildds.) [0] https://code.launchpad.net/~semiosis/livecd-rootfs/fix-for-1565985/+merge/298305 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1561250 Title: Xenial vagrant image is missing its hostname in /etc/hosts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1561250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
