In theory this is fine, but in practice will need more work.
For instance, in your examples grubx64.efi is being installed as the EFI
binary to run -- this is wrong, since grubx64.efi is only signed by the
Canonical keys, not by Microsoft keys, and so will fail to boot in a
Secure Boot scenario.
I think we'll also need to rework the naming -- "ubuntu", although being
perhaps too brief, has the benefit of being obvious (moreover, AIUI you
can have the same label as many times as you want). It would be better
to make sure update-grub and grub-install can correctly see the RAID
case as it is, and DTRT; such as installing to all members of the array,
adding the right modules to config (and in a Secure Boot scenario you'll
also need to have the modules included in the shipped grub EFI images).
Marking Triaged / Wishlist; I'll see with other people how to prioritize
this work.
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568050
Title:
grub-install removes other EFI boot entries
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1568050/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
