There is ongoing work on the Juju side to better test their LXD provider
by at the very least, properly triggering on new LXD uploads.

On my side, I do test Juju before new LXD releases. We missed that 2.1
issue because I ran my tests right before actually changing the version
string (which I do last as part of the tagging process).

So we're confident that as soon as Juju fixes their string parsing (in
fact, just remove it entirely), things will be fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1618159

Title:
  [FFe] Feature Exception for LXD in Ubuntu 16.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1618159/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to