Hi Michael
>I get that this is just a package split, so the content is the same and
doesn't need the same >rigorous check. But still, a few questions:
please don't take this assumption as granted,
$ pull-debian-source khronos-opencl-headers 2.0~svn32091-2
$ pull-debian-source khronos-opencl-clhpp
$ cd khronos-opencl-headers-2.0~svn32091
$ meld cl2.hpp ../khronos-opencl-clhpp-2.0.10/input_cl2.hpp
they look mostly the same, except for some bug fixes
>- Tests are disabled, and then some compile tests in debian/t/ are run
instead. The debian tests >look more like "does this compile" rather
than unit tests. Which is useful... But why not also the >upstream
tests?
they need some file that is not included in the tarball neither in the upstream
git repo
${CMOCK_DIR}/src/cmock.c
this file is missing and a cmake .. with tests enabled just simply fails
>- Needs a team bug subscriber. Probably ubuntu-x-swat like khronos-
opencl-headers uses.
not sure I can do this one, can you please add them or whoever you
prefer?
thanks!
** Changed in: khronos-opencl-clhpp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1636728
Title:
[MIR] khronos-opencl-clhpp
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/khronos-opencl-clhpp/+bug/1636728/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
