> there can be various reasons for unsigned binaries to be loaded 
> despite Secure Boot being marked as enabled in the firmware.

@cyphermox: I'd be curious to know what these "various reasons" are.
Obviously one is: Secure Boot enforcement was disabled via MokManager in
Shim. But what other reasons are there? If you have a minute could you
please mentione them? tia!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1401532

Title:
  GRUB's Secure Boot implementation loads unsigned kernel without
  warning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to