Hi Sam, Thank you for weighing in on this. I appreciate your opinion.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:03:11PM -0000, Sam Hartman wrote: > So, while I think your concern is reasonable, I'd urge you to consider > that you're setting a really high bar here for backporting a patch that > an interoperability-conscious upstream has vetted. I'm more bothered that we've considered and weighed up the non-Windows use case. I hadn't yet set a bar - I was just asking for regressions in all use cases to be considered and that consideration documented, as is SRU policy. This helps us reach a decision, and should ideally have happened first, before the SRU was accepted into the proposed pocket. I'm convinced by your arguments, so I'm happy with the testing already performed. Thank you to Bruce and Joshua for your work on this. We don't usually release SRUs on Fridays in case of regression, but I'd be happy to release this on Monday, subject to the usual checks. Robie -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1643708 Title: Add SPNEGO special case for NTLMSSP+MechListMIC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/+bug/1643708/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
