Hello Iain,

your patch had a few tests/pycodestyle errors, and I squashed them
together. However, when testing this I sometimes run into a timeout:

$ runner/autopkgtest tests/testpkg-reboot -- lxd autopkgtest/ubuntu/zesty/amd64
autopkgtest [10:43:57]: git checkout: 77cd1c3 doc/README.package-tests.rst: 
Document network access
autopkgtest [10:43:57]: host donald; command line: runner/autopkgtest 
tests/testpkg-reboot -- lxd autopkgtest/ubuntu/zesty/amd64
autopkgtest [10:44:10]: testbed dpkg architecture: amd64
autopkgtest [10:44:12]: testbed running kernel: Linux 4.8.0-29-generic 
#31~lp1626436ProposedWithTwoPatches SMP Fri Nov 18 18:21:38 UTC
autopkgtest [10:44:12]: @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ built-tree tests/testpkg-reboot
autopkgtest [10:44:12]: test p: preparing testbed
autopkgtest [10:44:14]: test p: [-----------------------
bash: line 1:   441 Killed                  
/tmp/autopkgtest.Hoe2Rq/tree/debian/tests/p 2> >(tee -a 
/tmp/autopkgtest.Hoe2Rq/p-stderr >&2) > >(tee -a 
/tmp/autopkgtest.Hoe2Rq/p-stdout)
autopkgtest [10:44:15]: test process requested reboot with marker phase1
error: Container is not running.
<VirtSubproc>: failure: timed out waiting for container autopkgtest-lxd-ydlkyp 
to restart
autopkgtest [10:46:06]: ERROR: testbed failure: cannot send to testbed: 
['BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe\n']

so this doesn't seem to be very reliable.

How does it fare on the production infra?

** Patch added: "adjusted patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1654025/+attachment/4807024/+files/0001-autopkgtest-virt-lxd-Check-uptime-for-reboot-waiting.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654025

Title:
  trusty/armhf dkms tests are killing workers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/1654025/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to