On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Stefan Bader <[email protected]> wrote:
> I created a modified patch and verified that > - bcache base devices again are numbered 0,1,... > - partioning a bcache device creates the expected bcacheXpY devices > Will submit this change upstream (and for pre-stable zesty). > > ** Patch added: "0001-bcache-Fix-bcache-device-names.patch" > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/ > 1667078/+attachment/4829714/+files/0001-bcache-Fix-bcache- > device-names.patch > > If possible, it would be good to avoid the div; that's why I had used a shift. In other drivers, they define a PART_BITS 4 or so and use that to shift up or down to get index vs. minor. > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667078 > > Title: > bcache device numbers increase by 16 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/ > 1667078/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667078 Title: bcache device numbers increase by 16 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1667078/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
