So Juju itself could accept apt_security_mirror as the configuration key and map that to whatever is necessary for the series we are deploying.
John =:-> On Mar 8, 2017 20:19, "Seyeong Kim" <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with jameinel, > > supporting kind of apt_security_mirror is better rather than failsafe. > > but still there is one issue if juju can support sort of > 'apt_security_mirror' from now. > > because of differences between cloud-init versions on trusty and xenial. > > I'm not sure it's possible to make cloud-init on trusty support > apt_seurity_mirror via SRU process. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to juju- > core. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1599886 > > Title: > apt-mirror does not override security.ubuntu.com for containers on > trusty > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1599886/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1599886 Title: apt-mirror does not override security.ubuntu.com for containers on trusty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1599886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
