On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:01 AM, ChristianEhrhardt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dann, thanks for your checks already! > Are you intending to break this down if e.g. Yakkety qemu is fixed as well as > zesty seems? > And then once we know if Y is good maybe even down to a bisect of qemu in > that regard?
hey Christian! Yep, that's my plan. > Given your checks already the test seems to be as "easy" as "boot zesty > + reboot = crash". > > Do you happen to know: > - if it makes a difference what exact arm HW (more diverse than x86 at least) > the host has? > - if it could be reproduced on qemu on x86 doing arm emulation? I don't have these data points yet, but I can collect them if the bisection method doesn't turn up a quick answer. -dann -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1675522 Title: arm64: Synchronous Exception at 0x00000000BBC129BC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/1675522/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
