This is a bit too much "nobody cares on yakkety" as after the fix it will
appear as regression X->Y upgrades. Yet the fix should be just the same, but
sponsors should mind that.
Jorge would you ack that the same should go to Yakkety or are there reasons not
to be seen too obviously that speaks against that?
Also I see that >=Xenial changes depend on libqb-dev >=0.12, but Trusty not.
Trusty would have 0.16.0.real-1ubuntu5 so it could have the >=0.12 as well
which makes me wonder even more why >=0.12 actually?
The issue is simple enough I don't see other reasons to not sponsor, but
those two points should be clarified/fixed before one is doing so.
** Also affects: corosync (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677684
Title:
/usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: 34: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: qb-
blackbox: not found
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1677684/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
