A few comments and questions: 1. Should we include the hv_sock module as built-in or keep it as a module?
2. It's better to try to reserve in upstream the address family number (AF_HYPERV) to avoid conflicts with future rebases and problems with userspace. 3. It seems that net/core/sock.c also needs to be updated with AF_HYPERV. I can include those changes on the patch that I will submit to our mailing list. But I'd like to have that patch reviewed but Microsoft. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690196 Title: [Hyper-V][SAUCE] hv_sock for 4.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1690196/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
